Seven-month developmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of delayed versus immediate cord clamping

88Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The results from our previous trial revealed that infants with delayed cord clamping (DCC) had significantly lesser intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and late-onset sepsis (LOS) than infants with immediate cord clamping (ICC). A priori, we hypothesized that infants with DCC would have better motor function by 7 months corrected age.Study Design: Infants between 24 and 31 weeks were randomized to ICC or DCC and follow-up evaluation was completed at 7 months corrected age.Result: We found no differences in the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) scores between the DCC and ICC groups. However, a regression model of effects of DCC on motor scores controlling for gestational age, IVH, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis and male gender suggested higher motor scores of male infants with DCC.Conclusion: DCC at birth seems to be protective of very low birth weight male infants against motor disability at 7 months corrected age. © 2010 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mercer, J. S., Vohr, B. R., Erickson-Owens, D. A., Padbury, J. F., & Oh, W. (2010). Seven-month developmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of delayed versus immediate cord clamping. Journal of Perinatology, 30(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.170

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free