Inverse parametrization of a regional groundwater flow model with the aid of modelling and GIS: Test and application of different approaches

12Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The use of inverse methods allow efficient model calibration. This study employs PEST to calibrate a large catchment scale transient flow model. Results are demonstrated by comparing manually calibrated approaches with the automated approach. An advanced Tikhonov regularization algorithm was employed for carrying out the automated pilot point (PP) method. The results indicate that automated PP is more flexible and robust as compared to other approaches. Different statistical indicators show that this method yields reliable calibration as values of coefficient of determination (R2) range from 0.98 to 0.99, Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (ME) range from 0.964 to 0.976, and root mean square errors (RMSE) range from 1.68 m to 1.23 m, for manual and automated approaches, respectively. Validation results of automated PP show ME as 0.969 and RMSE as 1.31 m. The results of output sensitivity suggest that hydraulic conductivity is a more influential parameter. Considering the limitations of the current study, it is recommended to perform global sensitivity and linear uncertainty analysis for the better estimation of the modelling results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Usman, M., Reimann, T., Liedl, R., Abbas, A., Conrad, C., & Saleem, S. (2018). Inverse parametrization of a regional groundwater flow model with the aid of modelling and GIS: Test and application of different approaches. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7010022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free