Abstract
Animal ethics committees have been set up in many countries as a way to scrutinize animal experimentation and to assure the public that if animals are used in research then it is for a worthwhile cause and suffering is kept to a minimum. The ideals of Refinement, Reduction and Replacement are commonly upheld. However while refinement and reduction receive much attention in animal ethics committees the replacement of animals is much more difficult to incorporate into the committees’ deliberations. At least in Australia there are certain structural reasons for this but it is likely that most of the reasons why replacement is left out apply to other countries as well.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Russell, D. (2011). Why animal ethics committees don’t work. Between the Species: An Online Journal for the Study of Philosophy and Animals, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.15368/bts.2012v15n1.1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.