Detecting Euphemisms with Literal Descriptions and Visual Imagery

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper describes our two-stage system for the Euphemism Detection shared task hosted by the 3rd Workshop on Figurative Language Processing in conjunction with EMNLP 2022. Euphemisms tone down expressions about sensitive or unpleasant issues like addiction and death. The ambiguous nature of euphemistic words or expressions makes it challenging to detect their actual meaning within a context. In the first stage, we seek to mitigate this ambiguity by incorporating literal descriptions into input text prompts to our baseline model. It turns out that this kind of direct supervision yields remarkable performance improvement. In the second stage, we integrate visual supervision into our system using visual imageries, two sets of images generated by a text-to-image model by taking terms and descriptions as input. Our experiments demonstrate that visual supervision also gives a statistically significant performance boost. Our system achieved the second place with an F1 score of 87.2%, only about 0.9% worse than the best submission.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kesen, I., Erdem, A., Erdem, E., & Calixto, I. (2022). Detecting Euphemisms with Literal Descriptions and Visual Imagery. In FLP 2022 - 3rd Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 61–67). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.flp-1.9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free