Comparison of the oral health problems and behavior of male daytime-only and night-shift office workers: An Internet survey

12Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the oral health problems and behavior of full-time male daytime-only and night shift office workers. Methods: The participants were recruited by applying screening procedures to a pool of Japanese registrants in an online database. During the period of 20 February 2015 to 11 March 2015, participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about their oral health. A total of 325 daytime-only workers and 351 workers who sometimes worked night shifts, ages 30 to 69, were analyzed in this study. Results: Overall, the mean number of teeth of the night shift workers was lower than that of the daytimeonly workers (p=0.002). When analyzed by age group, a significant difference was seen in the 50-69 age group (p =0.016). The percentage of night shift workers with decayed teeth was higher than that of the daytime-only workers (p<0.001). The night shift workers were more likely to report gingival bleeding (p=0.015) and stomatitis (p=0.025) than the daytime-only workers. The percentage of night shift workers reporting frequent brushing behavior was lower than that of the daytime-only workers (p =0.040). The independent variables found to correlate significantly with tooth decay were night shift work (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.20-2.67), current smoking habit (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.13-2.46), and BMI of≥25 (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.02-2.39). Conclusions: These results indicate a relationship between night shift work and oral health problems. Night shift workers may require additional support for oral health maintenance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishizuka, Y., Yoshino, K., Takayanagi, A., Sugihara, N., Maki, Y., & Kamijyo, H. (2016). Comparison of the oral health problems and behavior of male daytime-only and night-shift office workers: An Internet survey. Journal of Occupational Health, 58(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.15-0146-OA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free