Expedited Partner Therapy: Pharmacist Refusal of Legal Prescriptions

Abstract

Background Expedited partner therapy (EPT) is an effective strategy for partner management of sexually transmitted infections. Some states, including Wisconsin, allow EPT prescriptions to be filled without a patient name. This study determined the refusal rates of nameless EPT prescriptions in Milwaukee pharmacies. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 3 trained research assistants of different age, sex, and race posed as "patients" and visited 50 pharmacy locations from one pharmacy chain in Milwaukee County, WI, to fill nameless EPT prescriptions. A χ 2 test was used to compare demographics of patients, pharmacists, and pharmacies. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with prescription refusal. Results Twenty-nine (58%) of 50 nameless EPT prescriptions were refused. Univariate analysis showed that prescriptions were more likely to be refused if the pharmacy was in the suburbs (77%) compared with Milwaukee city (43%; P = 0.01), if the pharmacist was older than the patient (82%) compared with being younger (46%) or within the same age group (33%; P = 0.01 for both), and if the patient was white (78%) compared with nonwhite (47%; P = 0.03). Multivariable regression revealed significantly higher refusals for pharmacies located in the suburbs compared with the city (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-20.3; P = 0.03) and in patients who were white compared with nonwhite (odds ratio: 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-19.8; P = 0.01). Conclusions More than half of nameless EPT prescriptions were refused in Milwaukee county pharmacies, more frequently at suburban pharmacies and for white patients. Increased pharmacist education regarding EPT is essential to help combat the sexually transmitted infection crisis.