Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Among Students of Four Undergraduate Health Professions Education Programs

6Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In interprofessional learning, students from different professions learn about, from, and with each other so that they can collaborate effectively, deliver high-quality healthcare, and achieve positive health outcomes. This study aimed to explore the readiness of students from four health professions education programs for interprofessional learning. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out on 339 students. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) was used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used. Paired-samples t-test and ANOVA test were used to compare the responses of participants. Correlations between dependent and independent variables were explored by Pearson’s correlation test. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: The reliability study of the collected data showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s ɑ = 0.819). Results revealed a statistically significant difference between the responses of students from the four programs regarding the “Roles and Responsibilities” subscale (p = 0.000). A statistically significant difference between male and female students regarding two statements within the “Teamwork and Collaboration” subscale and one statement within the “Negative Professional Identity” subscale (p < 0.05) was also detected. The correlation study showed a weak but statistically significant correlation between RIPLS mean scores and the students’ study program (p < 0.015). Conclusion: In conclusion, the students showed readiness for IPL as evidenced by their positive perception of the interprofessional learning concepts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atwa, H., Abouzeid, E., Hassan, N., & Nasser, A. A. (2023). Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Among Students of Four Undergraduate Health Professions Education Programs. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 14, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S402730

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free