Systematic scoping review of the concept of 'genetic identity' and its relevance for germline modification

13Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

EU legislation prohibits clinical trials that modify germ line 'genetic identity'. 'Genetic identity' however, is left undefined. This study aims to identify the use of the term 'genetic identity' in academic literature, and investigate its relevance for debates on genetic modification. A total of 616 articles that contained the term were identified. Content analysis revealed that the term was used in various and contradicting ways and a clear understanding of the term is lacking. This review demonstrates that the EU legislation is open to interpretation, because of the diversity of meaning with which 'genetic identity' is currently used. Because of the diversity of meaning with which 'genetic identity' is used and understood, further reflection is needed. This requires further medical, legal, ethical and social debate and a coordinated response at both a European and a global level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goekoop, F. M., Van El, C. G., Widdershoven, G. A. M., Dzinalija, N., Cornel, M. C., & Evans, N. (2020). Systematic scoping review of the concept of “genetic identity” and its relevance for germline modification. PLoS ONE, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free