Abstract
The burden of proof and the standards of proof are two institutions that come from the old system of legal proof, in which they made sense. However, if evidence is free evaluated, the burden of proof is no longer useful and the standards of proof become mere imitations of the old categories "probatio plena" and "semiplena probatio" that are impossible to objectify. In this paper these conclusions are duly detailed and extensively justified.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Nieva-Fenoll, J. (2020). Burden of the Proof and Standards of Proof: Two Rests from the Past. InDret, 3, 406–437. https://doi.org/10.31009/InDret.2020.i3.13
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free