Large variability in ecosystem models explains uncertainty in a critical parameter for quantifying GPP with carbonyl sulphide

16Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Regional gross primary productivity (GPP) estimates are crucial to estimating carbon-climate feedbacks but are highly uncertain with existing methods. An emerging approach uses atmospheric carbonyl sulphide (COS) as a tracer for carbon dioxide: COS plant uptake is simulated by scaling GPP. Acritical parameter for this method is leaf-scale relative uptake (LRU). Plant chamber and eddy covariance studies find a narrow range of LRU values but some atmospheric modelling studies assign values well outside this range. Here we study this discrepancy by conducting new regional chemical transport simulations for North America using the underlying data from previous studies. We find the wide range of ecosystem model GPP estimates can explain the discrepancy in LRU values. We also find that COS concentration uncertainty is more sensitive to GPP uncertainty than to LRU parameter uncertainty. These results support the COS tracer technique as a useful approach for constraining GPP estimates.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hilton, T. W., Zumkehr, A., Kulkarni, S., Berry, J., Whelan, M. E., & Elliott Campbell, J. (2015). Large variability in ecosystem models explains uncertainty in a critical parameter for quantifying GPP with carbonyl sulphide. Tellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.26329

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free