Explaining Policy Convergence and Divergence through Policy Paradigm Shifts: A Comparative Analysis of Agricultural Risk Governance in OECD Countries

4Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study analyses policy convergence in agricultural policies and shows that the predominant policy paradigm of a country can be a major barrier that impedes policy convergence. To provide empirical evidence for the link, this research studies risk management support in agricultural policies in the framework of historical institutionalism by using a mixed methods approach. The comparative policy analysis of agricultural risk governance in OECD countries suggests a high path dependency of established institutions and instruments of the underlying policy paradigm that frequently prevent major support for risk management tools and do not lead to a clear policy convergence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Popp, T. R. (2021). Explaining Policy Convergence and Divergence through Policy Paradigm Shifts: A Comparative Analysis of Agricultural Risk Governance in OECD Countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(3), 310–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1674623

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free