Epidemiology of gentamicin-resistant, gram-negative bacillary colonization in a spinal cord injury unit

15Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A prospective epidemiological survey of a spinal cord injury unit for gentamicin-resistant, gram-negative bacilli was undertaken. The initial survey of the unit suggested a low level of cross-infection involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Providencia stuartii. However, a longitudinal study of new admissions revealed that only 13 of 52 nosocomial acquisitions could be considered to be due to cross colonization. Comparison of data on antibiotic use did not suggest selective pressure for resistant endogenous flora. Nosocomial acquisition was directly related to the length of the hospital stay. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of gentamicin-resistant, gram-negative bacilli showed only minor differences between nosocomial isolates and those present during the initial survey. Of the usual antimicrobial agents, amikacin, carbenicillin, and cefoxitin were the most active against all organisms, with the exception of Serratia spp. Of the new β-lactams, ceftazidime and imipemide (N-formimidoyl thienamycin) were most active.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shlaes, D. M., Currie, C. A., Rotter, G., Eanes, M., & Floyd, R. (1983). Epidemiology of gentamicin-resistant, gram-negative bacillary colonization in a spinal cord injury unit. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 18(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.18.2.227-235.1983

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free