Abstract
The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of an iodine-eluting stent with a conventional stent in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Patients with malignant esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to receive a conventional stent (group A) or an iodine-eluting stent (group B). Following implantation, the relief from dysphagia, survival time, routine blood tests, thyroid function examination and complications were compared in the two groups. Groups A and B consisted of 36 and 31 patients, respectively. The mean value that the dysphagia score decreased by was significantly lower in group A (0.83) compared with group B (1.65). The median survival time was longer in group B compared with group A (P=0.0022). No significant differences were observed in the severe complications between the two groups (P=0.084). The iodine-eluting esophageal stent is a relatively safe, feasible and effective treatment for malignant esophageal strictures.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Dai, Z., Zhou, D., Hu, J., Zhang, L., Lin, Y., Zhang, J., … Cao, F. (2013). Clinical application of iodine-eluting stent in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Oncology Letters, 6(3), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1466
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.