Utility of ethical frameworks in determining behavioral intention: A comparison of the U.S. and Russia

33Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Using Reidenbach and Robin's ( Journal of Business Ethics 7, 871-879, 1988) multi-criteria ethics instrument, we carried out the first empirical test of Robertson and Crittenden's (Strategic Management Journal 24, 385-392, 2003) cross-cultural map of moral philosophies to examine what ethical criteria guide business people in Russia and the U.S. in their intention to behave. Competing divergence and convergence hypotheses were advanced. Our results support a convergence hypothesis, and reveal a common emphasis on relativism. Americans are also influenced by the justice criterion while Russians tend to emphasize utilitarianism. © Springer 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beekun, R. I., Westerman, J., & Barghouti, J. (2005). Utility of ethical frameworks in determining behavioral intention: A comparison of the U.S. and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-4772-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free