Whose Side Are We On? Toward an Emancipatory Ethic in Critical Arts-Based Research

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The renowned U.S. sociologist Howard S. Becker, writing in 1969, posed the ethical question: Whose side are we on? In the context of continued structural inequalities in the distribution of power and wealth and individual and institutional oppression, in terms of class, race, gender, disability, and sexual orientation, this question remains as important as ever. The article, in advocating a robustly partisan approach, offers an emancipatory ethical framework continuum and an empirical example, from the authors’ critical arts-based research with undocumented Mexican Americans, to support and inform critical researchers, committed to working with oppressed groups against discrimination and for social justice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bagley, C., & Castro-Salazar, R. (2025). Whose Side Are We On? Toward an Emancipatory Ethic in Critical Arts-Based Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 31(10), 867–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004241288600

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free