The effect of flexible acrylic resin on masticatory muscle activity in implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a controlled clinical trial

  • Mostafa Ahmed Ibraheem E
  • Zakaria Nassani M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is not yet clear from the current literature to what extent masticatory muscle activity is affected by the use of flexible acrylic resin in the construction of implant-supported mandibular overdentures. OBJECTIVE: To compare masticatory muscle activity between patients who were provided with implant-supported mandibular overdentures constructed from flexible acrylic resin and those who were provided with implant-supported mandibular overdentures constructed from heat-cured conventional acrylic resin. METHODS: In this clinical trial, 12 completely edentulous patients were selected and randomly allocated into two equal treatment groups. Each patient in Group 1 received two implants to support a mandibular overdenture made of conventional acrylic resin. In Group 2, the patients received two implants to support mandibular overdentures constructed from "Versacryl" flexible acrylic resin. The maxillary edentulous arch for patients in both groups was restored by conventional complete dentures. For all patients, masseter and temporalis muscle activity was evaluated using surface electromyography (sEMG). RESULTS: The results showed a significant decrease in masticatory muscle activity among patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures constructed from flexible acrylic resin. CONCLUSION: The use of "Versacryl" flexible acrylic resin in the construction of implant-supported mandibular overdentures resulted in decreased masticatory muscle activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mostafa Ahmed Ibraheem, E., & Zakaria Nassani, M. (2016). The effect of flexible acrylic resin on masticatory muscle activity in implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a controlled clinical trial. Electronic Physician, 8(1), 1752–1758. https://doi.org/10.19082/1752

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free