Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of four iron fertilizer sources

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A relatively new iron fertilizer in the United States is FeHBED [Fe-N,N′-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N′-diacetate], a chelate with a stability constant for ferric iron greater than FeEDDHA [Fe-ethylenediamine-N,N′-bis(o-hydroxyphenylacetate]. This study compared response of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] over two greenhouse cropping periods to FeHBED, FeEDDHA-1 (∼80% ortho-ortho isomer), FeEDDHA-2 (∼50% ortho-ortho isomer), and FeEDDHSA [Fe-ethylenediamine-N,N-di([2-hydroxy 5-sulfophenyl])acetate]. FeHBED and FeEDDHA-1 gave positive responses to all measured parameters (chlorophyll level, dry matter production, Fe uptake) that were not significantly different (.05 level) from each other for the two cropping periods. The two products were similar in performance. FeEDDHA-2 and FeEDDHSA generally gave lesser responses than FeHBED or FeEDDHA-1. The relative effectiveness of the four materials to increase dry matter or Fe uptake was predicted by a simple laboratory test, which measures the proportion of applied Fe remaining soluble after a 1-wk incubation with soil.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goos, R. J. (2021). Laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of four iron fertilizer sources. Agricultural and Environmental Letters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free