Althusser’s maoism-machiavellianism and the maoist “people”/“masses”as a china question of western theory

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Mao’s concept of “people”/“masses” has entered Western theoretical production as the “China Question of Western Theory.” This article argues that it is necessary to rethink Althusser’s conception of “people”/“masses” from a Maoist-Machiavellian perspective. The factual overlapping of Althusser’s Maoist heyday and his increased interest in Machiavelli makes it necessary to conduct a Maoism-Machiavellianism cross-reading of Althusser’s theoretical works, although Althusser’s Maoism exceeds his Machiavellianism on some occasions. Such an overlapping resulted in Althusser’s reconfiguration of a notion of “people”/“masses” that is conjunctural, non-deterministic and non-humanist, which led to his theses of the New Prince/Principality, the supremacy of class struggle, masses-make-history, and eventually, helped him to conceive a non-linear, non-historicist vision of social formations, namely, the theory of the encounter.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yan, F. (2020). Althusser’s maoism-machiavellianism and the maoist “people”/“masses”as a china question of western theory. CLCWeb - Comparative Literature and Culture, 22(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3831

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free