IRCMS at SemEval-2018 Task 7: Evaluating a basic CNN Method and Traditional Pipeline Method for Relation Classification

2Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents our participation for subtask1 (1.1 and 1.2) in SemEval 2018 task 7: Semantic Relation Extraction and Classification in Scientific Papers (Gábor et al., 2018). We experimented on this task with two methods: CNN method and traditional pipeline method. We use the context between two entities (included) as input information for both methods, which extremely reduce the noise effect. For the CNN method, we construct a simple convolution neural network to automatically learn features from raw texts without any manual processing. Moreover, we use the softmax function to classify the entity pair into a specific relation category. For the traditional pipeline method, we use the Hackabout method as a representation which is described in section3.5. The CNN method's result is much better than traditional pipeline method (49.1% vs. 42.3% and 71.1% vs. 54.6%).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yin, Z., Luo, Z., Luo, W., Mao, B., Tian, C., Ye, Y., & Wu, S. (2018). IRCMS at SemEval-2018 Task 7: Evaluating a basic CNN Method and Traditional Pipeline Method for Relation Classification. In NAACL HLT 2018 - International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval 2018 - Proceedings of the 12th Workshop (pp. 811–815). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/s18-1129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free