Domestic Violence Involving Firearms: The Infrequent Inclusion of Full Firearms Prohibitions Within Civil Protection Orders

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Firearms make domestic violence more dangerous. Civil protection orders (“CPOs”) can include firearms prohibitions to separate abusers from firearms. This study reviewed 90% of CPO cases (N = 3,451) filed in South Carolina in 2019. The study found that when courts had discretion whether to issue a firearms prohibition (here, under state law), courts tended not to do so (32% of all eligible cases). When law automatically applied a firearms prohibition to cases (here, under federal law), courts typically included them (85% of all eligible cases), but not always, as 15% of petitioners who were entitled to the federal remedy were left unprotected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Swan, S. C., & Martin, L. V. (2026). Domestic Violence Involving Firearms: The Infrequent Inclusion of Full Firearms Prohibitions Within Civil Protection Orders. Feminist Criminology, 21(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851251387663

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free