“Cross-Disability” in India?: On the limits of Disability as a Category and the Work of Negotiating Impairments

  • Friedner M
  • Ghosh N
  • Palaniappan D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay analyzes the stakes involved when a movement claims to be “cross-disability” in India. Activists, disabled peoples’ organizations, and non-governmental organizations devoted to disability often claim that their work and focus is “cross-disability” and that all categories of disability are included within their purview. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted with various disability organizations and disabled people in India between 2008–2017, we argue that the “cross-disability” category obscures tensions that exist between different categories of disability, while benefiting the state and civil society. Moreover, performing representation results in fragmentation as different groups lobby for their own interests. We analyze the social and political work that the categories “cross-disability” and “disability” do in everyday worlds in India and analyze new forms of disability inclusions and exclusions that have emerged in the aftermath of a 2016 disability law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friedner, M., Ghosh, N., & Palaniappan, D. (2018). “Cross-Disability” in India?: On the limits of Disability as a Category and the Work of Negotiating Impairments. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal. https://doi.org/10.4000/samaj.4516

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free