Desflurane confers neurologic protection for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in newborn pigs

62Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA), as used for infant heart surgery, carry a risk of ischemic neurologic injury. Volatile anesthetics have neuroprotective properties against both global and focal ischemia at normothermia. The authors examined the hemodynamic and neuroprotective effects of desflurane in a piglet CPB-DHCA model. Methods: Twenty piglets aged 5-10 days received a desflurane- (6-9% expired) or fentanyl-based anesthetic before and during CPB (before and after DHCA). DHCA lasted 90 rain at 19°C brain. Cardiovascular variables (heart rate, arterial pressure, blood gases, glucose, brain temperature) were monitored. On postoperative day 2, neurologic and histologic outcomes were determined. Results: Cardiovascular variables before, during, and after CPB were physiologically similar between groups. The desflurane group had better neurologic performance (P=0.023) and greater postoperative weight gain (P=0.04) than the fentanyl group. In neocortex, the desflurane group had less tissue damage (P=0.0015) and fewer dead neurons (P=0.0015) than the fentanyl group. Hippocampal tissue damage was less in the desflurane group (P=0.05), but overall, neuronal cell counts in the CA1 sector of the right hippocampus were similar to those in the fentanyl group. Conclusions: Desflurane-based anesthesia yields hemodynamics during CPB with DHCA that are similar to those with fentanyl-based anesthesia. However, desflurane-based anesthesia improves neurologic and histologic outcomes of CPB-DHCA in comparison with outcomes with fentanyl-based anesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurth, C. D., Priestley, M., Marc Watzman, H., McCann, J., & Golden, J. (2001). Desflurane confers neurologic protection for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in newborn pigs. Anesthesiology, 95(4), 959–964. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200110000-00027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free