From Heterodoxy to Orthodoxy and Vice Versa: Economics and Social Sciences in the Division of Academic Work

25Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The term "heterodox economics" has been in existence for several decades. Recent revival of heterodox economics can be regarded as a growing criticism of economists within the own profession of economics. Modern economics is designed as a one-world-capitalism without history and without regional specifications, without institutions, and without real human agents. Heterodox approaches have the aim to underline that different institutions matter, including religion, language, family structures and networks, systems of education, and industrial relations. Taking the discussion within a broader framework of the history of science acknowleges divergencies and convergencies between different approaches in economics that are also in permanent recomposition. The discussion comes up with the interpretation that recent academic developments provide chances for new modes of intellectual reintegration of formerly disparate areas. © 2010 American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bögenhold, D. (2010). From Heterodoxy to Orthodoxy and Vice Versa: Economics and Social Sciences in the Division of Academic Work. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 69(5), 1566–1590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2010.00757.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free