Regulating low wages: Cross-national policy variation and outcomes

16Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of three central policies to regulate low wages: statutory minimum wages, state support for collective bargaining and topping up low wages with public transfers (in-work benefits). We map the variation of these policies across 33 OECD countries and analyze the incidence of low-wage employment they are associated with. We find three approaches to regulating low wages. In the first, 'wage scale protection', states put most emphasis on supporting collective bargaining. In the second, 'bare minimum', there is not much else than the statutory minimum wage. In the third, 'state pay', the statutory minimum wage is supplemented by sizeable public financial support for low earners. When analyzing policy outcomes, 'wage scale protection' is associated with least low-wage employment. For 'bare minimum', much depends on the level of the statutory minimum wage. Although 'state pay' props up workers' disposable income, many workers receive low gross pay.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pedersen, S. H., & Picot, G. (2023). Regulating low wages: Cross-national policy variation and outcomes. Socio-Economic Review, 21(4), 2093–2116. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwad019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free