Tissue thickness calculation in ocular optical coherence tomography

  • Alonso-Caneiro D
  • Read S
  • Vincent S
  • et al.
42Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

© 2016 Optical Society of America.Thickness measurements derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the eye are a fundamental clinical and research metric, since they provide valuable information regarding the eye’s anatomical and physiological characteristics, and can assist in the diagnosis and monitoring of numerous ocular conditions. Despite the importance of these measurements, limited attention has been given to the methods used to estimate thickness in OCT images of the eye. Most current studies employing OCT use an axial thickness metric, but there is evidence that axial thickness measures may be biased by tilt and curvature of the image. In this paper, standard axial thickness calculations are compared with a variety of alternative metrics for estimating tissue thickness. These methods were tested on a data set of wide-field chorio-retinal OCT scans (field of view (FOV) 60° × 25°) to examine their performance across a wide region of interest and to demonstrate the potential effect of curvature of the posterior segment of the eye on the thickness estimates. Similarly, the effect of image tilt was systematically examined with the same range of proposed metrics. The results demonstrate that image tilt and curvature of the posterior segment can affect axial tissue thickness calculations, while alternative metrics, which are not biased by these effects, should be considered. This study demonstrates the need to consider alternative methods to calculate tissue thickness in order to avoid measurement error due to image tilt and curvature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alonso-Caneiro, D., Read, S. A., Vincent, S. J., Collins, M. J., & Wojtkowski, M. (2016). Tissue thickness calculation in ocular optical coherence tomography. Biomedical Optics Express, 7(2), 629. https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.7.000629

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free