The role of maternal anti-A and anti-B antibody titers in predicting ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A study has been conducted on 268 blood group O delivering mothers and their related blood group A and B newborn infants. It revealed that the capability of mothers to produce anti-A and anti-B antibodies did not differ significantly from each other (p > 0.05). Ninety four (35.1%) of the newborns developed potentional jaundice while the others did not. To predict the birth of a baby with potential jaundice, a maternal anti-A or anti-B antibody titer of ≥ 1/256 was considered to be the cut-off point with a sensitivity and specificity of 83.33% and 78.21% respectively and a positive predictive value of 79.27% and a negative predictive value of 17.57%. If the maternal anti-A or anti-B antibody titer was ≥ 1/256 the risk for giving birth of a baby with potential jaundice rose significantly 18 times compared to those with titers of < 1/256 (OR 18, 64; CI 95% = 6.18-56.18).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kadri, N. (1998). The role of maternal anti-A and anti-B antibody titers in predicting ABO hemolytic disease of the newborn. Medical Journal of Indonesia, 7(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.13181/mji.v7i2.780

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free