Substrate specificity and interferences of a direct-electron-transfer-based glucose biosensor

14Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Electrochemical sensors for glucose monitoring employ diferent signal transduction strategies for electron transfer from the biorecognition element to the electrode surface. We present a biosensor that employs direct electron transfer and evaluate its response to various interfering substances known to affect glucose biosensors. Methods: The enzyme cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) was adsorbed on the surface of a carbon working electrode and covalently bound by cross linking. The response of CDH-modified electrodes to glucose and possible interfering compounds was measured by flow-injection analysis, linear sweep, and chronoamperometry. Results: Chronoamperometry showed initial swelling/wetting of the electrode. After stabilization, the signal was stable and a sensitivity of 0.21 μA mM-1 cm-2 was obtained. To investigate the influence of the interfering substances on the biorecognition element, the simplest possible sensor architecture was used. The biosensor showed little (<5% signal deviation) or no response to various reported electroactive or otherwise interfering substances. Conclusions: Direct electron transfer from the biorecognition element to the electrode is a new principle applied to glucose biosensors, which can be operated at a low polarization potential of -100 mV versus silver/silver chloride. The reduction of interferences by electrochemically active substances is an attractive feature of this promising technology for the development of continuous glucose biosensors. © Diabetes Technology Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Felice, A. K. G., Sygmund, C., Harreither, W., Kittl, R., Gorton, L., & Ludwig, R. (2013). Substrate specificity and interferences of a direct-electron-transfer-based glucose biosensor. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 7(3), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/193229681300700312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free