Peripheral i.v. analysis (PIVA) of venous waveforms for volume assessment in patients undergoing haemodialysis

22Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The assessment of intravascular volume status remains a challenge for clinicians. Peripheral i.v. analysis (PIVA) is a method for analysing the peripheral venous waveform that has been used to monitor volume status. We present a proof-of-concept study for evaluating the efficacy of PIVA in detecting changes in fluid volume. Methods We enrolled 37 hospitalized patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) as a controlled model for intravascular volume loss. Respiratory rate (F 0) and pulse rate (F 1) frequencies were measured. PIVA signal was obtained by fast Fourier analysis of the venous waveform followed by weighing the magnitude of the amplitude of the pulse rate frequency. PIVA was compared with peripheral venous pressure and standard monitoring of vital signs. Results Regression analysis showed a linear correlation between volume loss and change in the PIVA signal (R 2 =0.77). Receiver operator curves demonstrated that the PIVA signal showed an area under the curve of 0.89 for detection of 20 ml kg â '1 change in volume. There was no correlation between volume loss and peripheral venous pressure, blood pressure or pulse rate. PIVA-derived pulse rate and respiratory rate were consistent with similar numbers derived from the bio-impedance and electrical signals from the electrocardiogram. Conclusions PIVA is a minimally invasive, novel modality for detecting changes in fluid volume status, respiratory rate and pulse rate in spontaneously breathing patients with peripheral i.v. cannulas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hocking, K. M., Alvis, B. D., Baudenbacher, F., Boyer, R., Brophy, C. M., Beer, I., & Eagle, S. (2017). Peripheral i.v. analysis (PIVA) of venous waveforms for volume assessment in patients undergoing haemodialysis. In British Journal of Anaesthesia (Vol. 119, pp. 1135–1140). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex271

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free