Comparative efficacy and safety of late surfactant preparations: a retrospective study

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Characterize the use, efficacy, and safety of poractant alfa and calfactant surfactants compared to beractant in preterm infants receiving late surfactant. Study design: We included infants <37 weeks gestational age (GA) discharged from Pediatrix Medical Group-managed neonatal intensive care units (1997–2017). Efficacy and safety outcomes of interest were analyzed. Results: Of 184,770 infants administered surfactant at any time, 7846 (4.23%) received late surfactant at a median (25th, 75th percentile) PNA of 8 days (3, 22); specifically, 2976 received poractant alfa (38%), 2890 beractant (37%), and 1936 calfactant (25%). We identified no significant differences in composite efficacy or safety outcomes between surfactants in the primary analysis, but 33–36 week GA infants administered poractant alfa had significantly greater odds of developing a safety event. Conclusions: Compared to beractant, there is no evidence of overall superior efficacy or safety of poractant alfa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lane, M. D., Kishnani, S., Udemadu, O., Danquah, S. E., Treadway, R. M., Langman, A., … Zimmerman, K. O. (2021). Comparative efficacy and safety of late surfactant preparations: a retrospective study. Journal of Perinatology, 41(11), 2639–2644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01142-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free