Bayesian estimation of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy diagnostic test based on short-term heart rate variability without a gold standard

19Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the reference values for short-term heart rate variability (HRV), estimate the performance of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard, and assess CAN prevalence in our dataset. Setting: Community and hospital health centre. Participants: Of 2092 subjects available for data analysis, 371 healthy subjects were selected so the reference values for the short-term HRV test could be evaluated. An external dataset contained 88 subjects who completed both the short-term HRV test and Ewing's test. Intervention: Collection of information on clinical outcome. Primary and second outcome measures: Cardiovascular autonomic function evaluated by using the short-term HRV test and/or Ewing's test. Results: Cut-off points of 356.13, 55.45 and 36.64 ms2 were set for total power, low frequency and high frequency (HF), respectively. The diagnostic test for CAN based on the mentioned reference value was created. The HRV test had a high sensitivity (80.01-85.09%) and specificity (82.30-85.20%) for CAN. In addition, the non-inferiority test rejected the null hypothesis that the performance of the HRV test was inferior to that of Ewing's test (p<0.05). The estimated CAN prevalence was 14.92% and 29.17% in the total sample and patients with diabetes, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings provided reference values for short-term HRV, which were used for the CAN diagnostic test with high sensitivity and specificity. The estimated CAN prevalence was high in the Chinese population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, Z. H., Wang, L., Zeng, F., Li, Z., Yu, X., Zhang, K., & Zhou, L. (2014). Bayesian estimation of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy diagnostic test based on short-term heart rate variability without a gold standard. BMJ Open, 4(10). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free