The Power of Literal Equivalence in Model Counting

22Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The past two decades have seen the significant improvements of the scalability of practical model counters, which have been influential in many applications from artificial intelligence to formal verification. While most of exact counters fall into two categories, search-based and compilation-based, Huang and Darwiche’s remarkable observation ties these two categories: the trace of a search-based exact model counter corresponds to a Decision-DNNF formula. Taking advantage of literal equivalences, this paper designs an efficient model counting technique such that its trace is a generalization of Decision-DNNF. We first propose a generalization of Decision-DNNF, called CCDD, to capture literal equivalences, then show that CCDD supports model counting in linear time, and finally design a model counter, called ExactMC, whose trace corresponds to CCDD. We perform an extensive experimental evaluation over a comprehensive set of benchmarks and conduct performance comparison of ExactMC vis-a-vis the state of the art counters, c2d, Dsharp, miniC2D, D4, ADDMC, and Ganak. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates ExactMC can solve 885 instances while the prior state of the art solved only 843 instances, representing a significant improvement of 42 instances.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lai, Y., Meel, K. S., & Yap, R. H. C. (2021). The Power of Literal Equivalence in Model Counting. In 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021 (Vol. 5A, pp. 3851–3859). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16503

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free