Imprisonment for breach of injunctions: what is happening in the civil courts?

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Drawing on a dataset of 263 contempt of court decisions, this paper examines a widespread but under-interrogated phenomenon: imprisonment for breach of injunctions. Across a wide range of contexts – from cases involving anti-social behaviour, protest, Gypsy and Traveller communities – courts across the country are using their civil contempt of court powers to imprison individuals for breaching injunctions. As the first research to date that explicitly examines this issue, the paper falls into four parts. First, it introduces the powers to make an injunction; in section 2 the courts’ powers on committal are outlined. Section 3 introduces the dataset on which this paper is based. Finally, section 4 explores the geographical distribution of cases, sentencing decisions, and the representation of defendants in these proceedings. We identify significant disparities in the application and enforcement of injunctions, raising critical questions about legal practices, fairness and equality. We advocate for ongoing academic research in this area.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hunter, C., Epstein, R., & Meers, J. (2024). Imprisonment for breach of injunctions: what is happening in the civil courts? Legal Studies, 44(3), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2024.14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free