Approach Generative AI Tools Proactively or Risk Bypassing the Learning Process in Higher Education

  • Sallai D
  • Cardoso-Silva J
  • Barreto M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The growing reliance of higher education (HE) students on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools for learning and assessment risks circumventing rather than enhancing the learning process without adequate support and direction. Reflecting on experiences within a UK university, we explored how students use GenAI tools in practice. We argue that students rely on GenAI differently for learning than for assessments and tend to focus more on the output or performance than on the learning journey itself. This raises questions on how GenAI can be successfully integrated into the curriculum without jeopardising learning. Based on observations that some students use GenAI platforms as a substitute for learning rather than as a tool to enhance learning, our policy recommendations focus on curriculum planning and assessment design.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sallai, D., Cardoso-Silva, J., Barreto, M., Panero, F., Berrada, G., & Luxmoore, S. (2024). Approach Generative AI Tools Proactively or Risk Bypassing the Learning Process in Higher Education. LSE Public Policy Review, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free