Integrated care pathways: Disease-specific or process-specific?

8Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background/Aim: conventional teaching on integrated care pathways (ICP) suggests that they have to be specific both to a particular setting and to a specific diagnosis. We wished to explore the potential for a generic process-based care pathway. Study design: we evaluated three different, disease-specific ICPs in use on a neurological rehabilitation unit to identify prompts common to and differing between them. Variance types and goal outcomes in all three diagnostic groups were compared. Results: 93% of prompts on the care pathway were common to all three diagnostic groups. The prompts that differed were unique to each diagnostic group and provided important guidelines about management. Conclusion: in neurorehabilitation, where the process of multidisciplinary care is well defined, it is possible to develop a process-based ICP. Process-based ICPs may not be unique to rehabilitation but may also be relevant to other settings in which patients with differing diagnoses share similar needs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Edwards, S. G. M., Thompson, A. J., & Playford, E. D. (2004). Integrated care pathways: Disease-specific or process-specific? Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 4(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.4-2-132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free