Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation

16Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Quality in medical care must be measured in order to be improved. Trauma management is part of health care, and by definition, it must be checked constantly. The only way to measure quality and outcomes is to systematically accrue data and analyze them. Material and methods: A systematic revision of the literature about quality indicators in trauma associated to an international consensus conference Results: An internationally approved base core set of 82 trauma quality indicators was obtained: Indicators were divided into 6 fields: prevention, structure, process, outcome, post-traumatic management, and society integrational effects. Conclusion: Present trauma quality indicator core set represents the result of an international effort aiming to provide a useful tool in quality evaluation and improvement. Further improvement may only be possible through international trauma registry development. This will allow for huge international data accrual permitting to evaluate results and compare outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coccolini, F., Kluger, Y., Moore, E. E., Maier, R. V., Coimbra, R., Ordoñez, C., … Romeo, L. (2021). Trauma quality indicators: internationally approved core factors for trauma management quality evaluation. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00350-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free