Occupational psychosocial factors in primary care continuing care staff

6Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This involves studying the psychosocial factors among the emergencies staff of primary care and seeing if there are differences with the primary health care staff at the Primary Care of the Integrated Care Management of Talavera de la Reina (Spain). Descriptive epidemiological study of type transversal. They have participated 51 emergencies staff of primary care and 50 primary health professionals from a sample of urban and rural health centres. The F-Psico 3.1 questionnaire has been used to evaluate the nine psychosocial risk factors. The emergencies staff quantify the psychosocial factors of working time (19.6 SD 5.7) and autonomy (69.8 SD 23.2) as a higher risk situation compared to the other health care staff with 3.7 SD 4, 7 and 52.1 SD 21.8, respectively (p < 0.05). In addition, the role performance is valued as a lower risk situation by the emergencies staff of primary care (p < 0.05). The workload assessment is the only difference between the emergencies staff of primary care in urban centres (61.5 SD 17.6) and rural (45.2 SD 18.4) (p < 0.05). Women have the highest workload (p < 0.05). It is necessary to apply preventive measures and policies applicable to women who work in emergencies, especially in urban areas to reduce their workload.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fonseca, J. G., Romo-Barrientos, C., Criado-álvarez, J. J., González-González, J., Martín-Conty, J. L., Mohedano-Moriano, A., & Viñuela, A. (2020). Occupational psychosocial factors in primary care continuing care staff. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186791

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free