Comparison of dot filter hybridization, southern transfer hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction amplification for diagnosis of anal human papillomavirus infection

41Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The detection and classification of human papillomavirus (HPV) by a consensus primer polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique were compared with detection and classification by dot filter hybridization (DFH) and Southern transfer hybridization (STH). PCR detected HPV in 87% of specimens; the detection rates for DFH and STH were 51% and 49%, respectively. The specific HPV types detected by STH were also detected by PCR in 90% of specimens. However, 75% of the samples positive for unclassified HPV by STH were typed by PCR. PCR results were reproducible, as assessed by repeat analysis (96% agreement), by analysis of paired same-day specimens (89% agreement), and by interlaboratory analysis (88% agreement). PCR is a sensitive, specific, and reproducible test for HPV detection and classification in clinical and epidemiologic studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuypers, J. M., Critchlow, C. W., Gravitt, P. E., Vernon, D. A., Sayer, J. B., Manos, M. M., & Kiviat, N. B. (1993). Comparison of dot filter hybridization, southern transfer hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction amplification for diagnosis of anal human papillomavirus infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.31.4.1003-1006.1993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free