Navigating the unknown: Towards a positive conception of anonymity

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Talk of anonymity floats freely and, in many contexts, rampantly in everyday, nonphilosophical discourse. But despite a surge of interest in anonymity-in anonymity protections, on the one hand, and anonymity harms and abuses, on the other-it is not at all clear what anonymity is. Is it simply a matter of being unknown? Or is anonymity something more, or less, than this? Unfortunately, existing analyses frame anonymity very generally as a phenomenon of unknowability and/or concealment. Consequently, they fail to capture what distinguishes anonymity and anonymity relations from, for example, privacy and privacy relations. In this paper, I explore a more precise way of articulating anonymity, developing what I call the central anonymity paradigm, which frames anonymity as the result of a specific exercise of control in which true pieces of information about a person are concealed from others with an effect of dissociability. I use this paradigm to show how anonymity is characteristically interpersonal and network-relative, and deeply connected to issues of personal identity. © 2013 The University of Memphis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ponesse, J. (2013, September). Navigating the unknown: Towards a positive conception of anonymity. Southern Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free