Development of a pediatric-specific clinical probability tool for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: A feasibility study

24Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:Pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an increasingly common, difficult to diagnose problem. Clinical probability tools (CPT) for adults estimate VTE likelihood, but are not available for children. We hypothesized that a pediatric-specific CPT is feasible.Methods:Radiology reports were utilized to identify children imaged for suspected VTE. Relevant signs, symptoms, and comorbidity variables, identified from published literature, were extracted from corresponding medical records. Variables associated with pediatric VTE were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression to create a pilot CPT which was confirmed on a separate cohort.Results:A total of 389 subjects meeting inclusion criteria were identified: 91 with VTE and 298 without. Univariate analysis revealed male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 2.96; P < 0.001), asymmetric extremity (OR = 1.76; P = 0.033), central venous catheter utilization and/or dysfunction (OR = 2.51; P < 0.001), and cancer (OR = 2.35; P = 0.014) as VTE predictive variables. Documentation of an alternate diagnosis was inversely related to VTE (OR = 0.42; P = 0.004). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the derived CPT demonstrated reasonable ability to discriminate VTE probability in the training cohort (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.73; P < 0.001) and moderate discrimination in a separate validation cohort of 149 children (AUC = 0.64; P = 0.011).Conclusion:A pediatric-specific VTE CPT is feasible, would facilitate early diagnosis, and could lead to improved outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kerlin, B. A., Stephens, J. A., Hogan, M. J., Smoyer, W. E., & O’Brien, S. H. (2015). Development of a pediatric-specific clinical probability tool for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: A feasibility study. Pediatric Research, 77(3), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.198

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free