Abstract
We discover and document errors in public-use microdata samples ("PUMS files") of the 2000 Census, the 2003-2006 American Community Survey, and the 2004-2009 Current Population Survey. For women and men age 65 and older, age- and sex-specific population estimates generated from the PUMS files differ by as much as 15 percent from counts in published data tables. Moreover, an analysis of labor-force participation and marriage rates suggests the PUMS samples are not representative of the population at individual ages for those age 65 and over. PUMS files substantially underestimate labor-force participation of those near retirement age and overestimate labor-force participation rates of those at older ages. These problems were an unintentional byproduct of the misapplication of a newer generation of disclosure-avoidance procedures carried out on the data. The resulting errors in the public-use data could significantly impact studies of people age 65 and older, particularly analyses of variables that are expected to change by age. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Alexander, J. T., Davern, M., & Stevenson, B. (2010). The polls-review: Inaccurate age and sex data in the Census PUMS files: Evidence and implications. In Public Opinion Quarterly (Vol. 74, pp. 551–569). https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq033
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.