The polls-review: Inaccurate age and sex data in the Census PUMS files: Evidence and implications

15Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We discover and document errors in public-use microdata samples ("PUMS files") of the 2000 Census, the 2003-2006 American Community Survey, and the 2004-2009 Current Population Survey. For women and men age 65 and older, age- and sex-specific population estimates generated from the PUMS files differ by as much as 15 percent from counts in published data tables. Moreover, an analysis of labor-force participation and marriage rates suggests the PUMS samples are not representative of the population at individual ages for those age 65 and over. PUMS files substantially underestimate labor-force participation of those near retirement age and overestimate labor-force participation rates of those at older ages. These problems were an unintentional byproduct of the misapplication of a newer generation of disclosure-avoidance procedures carried out on the data. The resulting errors in the public-use data could significantly impact studies of people age 65 and older, particularly analyses of variables that are expected to change by age. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alexander, J. T., Davern, M., & Stevenson, B. (2010). The polls-review: Inaccurate age and sex data in the Census PUMS files: Evidence and implications. In Public Opinion Quarterly (Vol. 74, pp. 551–569). https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free