Abstract
In this study, we identified the code-related (decoding, fluency) and language comprehension (vocabulary, listening comprehension) demands of the CBM-Maze test, a formative assessment, and compared them to those of the Gates–MacGinitie test, a standardized summative assessment. The demands of these reading comprehension tests and their developmental patterns were examined with multigroup structural regression models in a sample of 274 children in Grades 4, 7, and 9. The results showed that the CBM-Maze test relied more on code-related than on language comprehension skills when compared to the Gates–MacGinitie test. These demands were relatively stable across grades.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Muijselaar, M. M. L., Kendeou, P., de Jong, P. F., & van den Broek, P. W. (2017). What Does the CBM-Maze Test Measure? Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1263994
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.