Epinephrine plus argon plasma or heater probe coagulation in ulcer bleeding

16Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of argon plasma coagulation (APC) and heater probe coagulation (HPC) in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. METHODS: Eighty-five (18 female, 67 male) patients admitted for acute gastrointestinal bleeding due to gastric or duodenal ulcer were included in the study. Upper endoscopy was performed and HPC or APC were chosen randomly to stop the bleeding. Initial hemostasis and rebleeding rates were primary and secondary end-points of the study. RESULTS: Initial hemostasis was achieved in 97.7% (42/43) and 81% (36/42) of the APC and HPC groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Rebleeding rates were 2.4% (1/42) and 8.3% (3/36) in the APC and HPC groups, respectively, at 4 wk (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: APC is an effective hemostatic method in bleeding peptic ulcers. Larger multicenter trials are necessary to confirm these results. © 2011 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karaman, A., Baskol, M., Gursoy, S., Torun, E., Yurci, A., Ozel, B. D., … Yucesoy, M. (2011). Epinephrine plus argon plasma or heater probe coagulation in ulcer bleeding. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 17(36), 4109–4112. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i36.4109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free