Writer as perv: bricolage, bowerbirding, observation

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Recently it was suggested that my creative method (bowerbirding, bricolage, engaged observation) might properly be described as ‘perving’. Affronted, I rejected this accusation. But the idea wouldn’t go away, a question remained. How does observation that informs a story differ from perving or voyeurism? Creative writers lurk everywhere, observing and eavesdropping for quirks and foibles to bring life to their stories. I review my creative methodology against the current discourse about the eclectic methods of enquiry through which writers interrogate the world, including thievery, plagiarism, borrowing, voyeurism, perving, to assess the validity of this charge of perversion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greet, P. (2017). Writer as perv: bricolage, bowerbirding, observation. New Writing, 14(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2016.1223142

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free