WORKPLACE DEVIANCE REVIEW – A PHILOSOPHICAL STANCE

  • Arshad M
  • Malik M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The research aimed to compile extensive literature on workplace deviance typology. Methodology: The research comprises a systematic literature review. The review helps to understand the extensive work on workplace deviance (1983-2019). The articles were shortlisted based on PRISMA, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews, to provide a clear picture. Based on 75 shortlisted articles from financial times (FT) – 50. The shortlisted articles comprise four clusters, i.e., antecedents, consequences, mediators, and moderators. Main Findings: The research found the need to explore future research based on a social constructivist lens. Applications of this study: The research provides a way forward to extend research in workplace deviance. Research developed a framework to guide future research on the new relationships of workplace deviance. Hence, empirical work on these relationships can offer new insights into construct dimensionality, methodology, and philosophy. Novelty/Originality of this study: After highlighting the key contributions of the previous researchers, the research attempted to articulate the ontology of workplace deviance by suggesting the need to investigate it through a different philosophical lens. Researchers then identified various gaps to be addressed in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arshad, M., & Malik, M. A. R. (2021). WORKPLACE DEVIANCE REVIEW – A PHILOSOPHICAL STANCE. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(4), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2021.9414

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free