In search of negativity bias: An empirical study of perceived helpfulness of online reviews

230Citations
Citations of this article
272Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A basic tenet of psychology is that the psychological effects of negative information outweigh those of positive information. Three empirical studies show that the negativity bias can be attenuated or even reversed in the context of electronic word of mouth (eWoM). The first study analyzes a large sample of customer reviews collected from Amazon.com and concludes that negative reviews are no more helpful than positive ones when controlling for review quality The second study follows up with a virtual experiment that confirms the lack of negativity bias in evaluating the helpfulness of online reviews. The third study demonstrates that the negativity effect can be reversed by manipulating the baseline valences. This work challenges the conventional wisdom of "bad is stronger than good" and contributes to the understanding of the eWoM phenomenon. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, P. F. (2013). In search of negativity bias: An empirical study of perceived helpfulness of online reviews. Psychology and Marketing, 30(11), 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20660

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free