Abstract
Background: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS. Methods: In the phase-Ib-study, patients with R/M SCCHN received methotrexate and cetuximab as first-line treatment. The primary objective was feasibility. In the phase-II-study patients were randomized to this combination or methotrexate alone (2:1). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). Results: In six patients in the phase-Ib-study, no dose limiting toxicities were observed. In the phase II study, 30 patients received the combination and 15 patients methotrexate. In the phase-II-study median PFS was 4.5 months in the combination group vs 2.0 months in the methotrexate group (HR 0.37; P =.002). OS, toxicity, and QoL were not significantly different. Conclusion: Cetuximab with methotrexate improved PFS without increased toxicity in R/M SCCHN-patients.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ham, J. C., van Meerten, E., Fiets, W. E., Beerepoot, L. V., Jeurissen, F. J. F., Slingerland, M., … van Herpen, C. M. L. (2020). Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first-line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib-randomized phase II study Commence. Head and Neck, 42(5), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.26053
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.