The impact of policy measures on human mobility, COVID‐19 cases, and mortality in the US: A spatiotemporal perspective

Abstract

Social distancing policies have been regarded as effective in containing the rapid spread of COVID‐19. However, there is a limited understanding of policy effectiveness from a spatiotem-poral perspective. This study integrates geographical, demographical, and other key factors into a regression‐based event study framework, to assess the effectiveness of seven major policies on human mobility and COVID‐19 case growth rates, with a spatiotemporal emphasis. Our results demonstrate that stay‐at‐home orders, workplace closures, and public information campaigns were effective in decreasing the confirmed case growth rate. For stay‐at‐home orders and workplace clo-sures, these changes were associated with significant decreases (p < 0.05) in mobility. Public information campaigns did not see these same mobility trends, but the growth rate still decreased sig-nificantly in all analysis periods (p < 0.01). Stay‐at‐home orders and international/national travel controls had limited mitigation effects on the death case growth rate (p < 0.1). The relationships between policies, mobility, and epidemiological metrics allowed us to evaluate the effectiveness of each policy and gave us insight into the spatiotemporal patterns and mechanisms by which these measures work. Our analysis will provide policymakers with better knowledge regarding the effectiveness of measures in space–time disaggregation.