Proposal of venous drainage-based classification system for carotid cavernous fistulae with validity assessment in a multicenter cohort

47Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Carotid cavernous fistulae (CCFs) are most commonly classified based on arterial supply. Symptomatology and treatment approach, however, are largely influenced by venous drainage. OBJECTIVE: To propose an updated classification system using venous drainage. METHODS: CCFs with posterior/inferior drainage only, posterior/inferior and anterior drainage, anterior drainage only, and retrograde drainage into cortical veins with/without other drainage channels were designated as types 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. CCFs involving a direct connection between the internal carotid artery and cavernous sinus were designated as type 5. This system was retrospectively applied to 29 CCF patients. RESULTS: Our proposed classification was significantly associated with symptomatology (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, A. J., Chua, M., Fusco, M., Ogilvy, C. S., Tubbs, R. S., Harrigan, M. R., & Griessenauer, C. J. (2015). Proposal of venous drainage-based classification system for carotid cavernous fistulae with validity assessment in a multicenter cohort. Neurosurgery, 77(3), 380–385. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000829

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free