Cost-effectiveness of algorithms for confirmation test of human African trypanosomiasis

22Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The control of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) is compromised by low sensitivity of the routinely used parasitologic confirmation tests. More sensitive alternatives, such as mini-anion exchange centrifugation technique (mAECT) or capillary tube centrifugation (CTC), are more expensive. We used formal decision analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative HAT confirmation algorithms in terms of cost per life saved. The effectiveness of the standard method, a combination of lymph node puncture (LNP), fresh blood examination (FBE), and thick blood film (TBF), was 36.8%; the LNP-FBE-CTC-mAECT sequence reached almost 80%. The cost per person examined ranged from €1.56 for LNP-FBE-TBF to €2.99 for LNP-TBF-CTC-mAECT-CATT (card agglutination test for trypanosomiasis) titration. LNP-TBF-CTC-mAECT was the most cost effective in terms of cost per life saved. HAT confirmation algorithms that incorporate concentration techniques are more effective and efficient than the algorithms that are currently and routinely used by several T.b. gambiense control programs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lutumba, P., Meheus, F., Robays, J., Miaka, C., Kande, V., Büscher, P., … Boelaert, M. (2007). Cost-effectiveness of algorithms for confirmation test of human African trypanosomiasis. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 13(10), 1484–1490. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1310.060358

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free