Body position affects performance in untrained cyclists

42Citations
Citations of this article
153Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare cardiovascular and ventilatory variables in upright versus aero cycle ergometry at submaximal and maximal exercise intensities in untrained cyclists. Method: Ten physically active men (mean (SD) age 19.1 (1.10) years) who were unfamiliar with aerobars underwent maximal exercise testing and steady state cycling at 50, 100, and 150 W. Results: Participants had significantly greater maxima for oxygen uptake (VO2), ventilation, heart rate, and workload maximum in the upright position. During steady state cycling at the three workloads, VO2 (ml/kg/min) and gross mechanical efficiency were significantly greater in the upright position. Conclusions: In untrained subjects performing with maximal effort, the upright position permits greater VO2, ventilation, heart rate, and workload maxima. Further, in the steady state, exercise cycling may be less costly in the upright position. For this reason, untrained cyclists need to weigh body position effects against the well known aerodynamic advantages of the aero position.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ashe, M. C., Scroop, G. C., Frisken, P. I., Amery, C. A., Wilkins, M. A., & Khan, K. M. (2003). Body position affects performance in untrained cyclists. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(5), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.5.441

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free